Internal Agents Map

Pinecone

Pinecone is Sierra's shared agent interface for employee work. It routes requests to a model, harness, and environment, runs sessions on Agency, and connects to company systems through an MCP Gateway.

Company
Sierra
Approach type
Agent
Human involvement
Drafts reviewed
Interfaces
Slack, Web, Linear, Mobile
Deployment stage
Scaled
Evidence strength
Detailed primary
Entry reviewed
Copy as MDAsk ChatGPT

How it works

Employee prompt to a streamed cloud session with brokered pull requests.

Start a session from a prompt

A prompt creates an isolated pod with a checked-out repository, warm build cache, sidecars, and a harness; the session streams its work back for watching, interrupting, or redirecting[Source 1]

Broker its own pull requests

A session opens its own pull requests and watches its own checks[Source 1]

Where people stay involved

People review, approve, or guide the agent’s work here.

Reported: Sessions stream to the requester, who can watch, interrupt, or redirect; PR babysitting escalates to a person only when judgment is required.

  • Supervision level

    Work-product review

    A person reviews the draft or implementation.

    Level 3 of 5

    • employee request → reviewed agent output[Source 1]

How supervision levels work

Implementation details

Model
Claude Code + Codex; a classifier routes by task intent to select repository, environment, harness, model, and reasoning budget[Source 1]
Harness
App server + Agency + runners; intent-based model/environment routing (Claude Code + Codex)[Source 1, Source 3]
Sandbox
Agency layer reconciles recoverable Kubernetes runners; conversation/events/checkpoints stay durable separately[Source 3]
Tool access
MCP Gateway connected to 45 systems; a network proxy decides whether privileged requests proceed and injects credentials after approval[Source 2]
Knowledge
Durable sessions over disposable environments; Redis Streams[Source 1, Source 3]
Context management
Durable session state separated from ephemeral compute[Source 3]
Credentials
Gateway enforces the invoking employee's access at tool-call time and isolates customer data; the harness never holds the real secret[Source 2, Source 3]
Interfaces
  • slack
  • web
  • linear
  • mobile
[Source 1]

Mechanisms

MCP Gateway (45 systems)

One gateway spanning 45 systems, enforcing employee permissions at call time[Source 2]

Agency sandbox layer

Recoverable K8s runners with a network proxy for credential injection[Source 3]

Intent-based routing

Routes model and environment by request intent, independent of the tool layer[Source 1]

Validation and failure handling

Babysit the pull request

A monitor sub-agent answers machine-review comments, fixes failing tests, rebases on conflicts, and pings a person in Slack when a decision needs a human[Source 1]

Reported observations

These results come from the sources. Notes below each result explain what it covers and any reported limits.

Headline claim

More than 75,000 sessions created by 600 people in the month preceding the report[Source 1]

Reported by
Sierra
Scope
Pinecone users and sessions in the month preceding the report; calendar month unspecified

The source does not report the denominator of this figure.

About this result
Category
Adoption output
Evidence type
Reported measurement
What it covers
Pinecone sessions created by Sierra employees in the month preceding the report
Key observation

70% of company PRs opened through Pinecone in the month preceding the report[Source 1]

Reported by
Sierra
Scope
Company PRs opened through Pinecone in the month preceding the report
Denominator
Sierra PRs opened in that month; not merged PRs
About this result
Category
Adoption output
Evidence type
Reported measurement
What it covers
Sierra pull requests opened through Pinecone in the month preceding the report
Key observation

96% of engineering uses Pinecone; the majority of the company works in it every day[Source 1]

Reported by
Sierra
Scope
Engineering use of Pinecone and company-wide daily use at report time

The source does not report the denominator of this figure.

Observed in 2026

About this result
Category
Adoption output
Evidence type
Reported measurement
What it covers
Engineering adoption of Pinecone and company-wide daily use
Key observation

Usage has tripled every month since April while costs fell[Source 1]

Reported by
Sierra
Scope
Pinecone usage growth since April and reported falling costs; no absolute figures published

The source does not report the denominator of this figure.

Observed in 2026

About this result
Category
Adoption output
Evidence type
Reported measurement
What it covers
Pinecone usage growth since April with reported falling costs

Lessons

Pinecone presents one entry point while a classifier chooses the repository, environment, harness, and model for the task.[Source 1]

Sierra wraps Codex and Claude Code behind a common runner protocol and can change routing defaults centrally.[Source 1]

Sierra's gateway audits customer-data access and blocks sensitive access spanning multiple customers in a session; some CLI access uses separate read-only tokens.[Source 2]

Catalog interpretation: Sierra's session total measures use of Pinecone; it does not by itself measure time saved or the quality of completed work.[Source 1]

Back to agents
Improve this record

Give your coding agent the context and instructions to prepare a source-backed update.

Paste the prompt into your coding agent, then describe the correction or add a public source.

Preview prompt

Sources and research details

Citations link to the original publisher. Each source also keeps a preserved copy in the repository, so a changed or removed page stays checkable.

  1. Pinecone: harnessing the wisdom of the workforcehttps://sierra.ai/jp/blog/pinecone-harnessing-the-wisdom-of-the-workforceEngineering blog · First party · Last source verification: 2026-08-31
  2. Building Sierra's MCP Gatewayhttps://sierra.ai/blog/building-sierras-mcp-gateway-an-engineering-icebergEngineering blog · First party · Last source verification: 2026-08-31
  3. Agency: secure, scalable sandboxes for agentshttps://sierra.ai/es/blog/agency-secure-scalable-sandboxes-for-agentsEngineering blog · First party · Last source verification: 2026-08-31
Question coverage and scope
purpose
Reported
workflow
Reported: The three pre-existing primitives are reusable mechanisms; the run is prompt to session to brokered pull request.
human involvement
Reported: Sessions stream to the requester, who can watch, interrupt, or redirect; PR babysitting escalates to a person only when judgment is required.
implementation
Reported
validation
Reported: The documented check is the babysitting loop: watched CI checks, fixed failing tests, and answered machine-review comments.
observations
Reported
lessons
Reported
Research details for every claim on this page
  1. Summary
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  2. Headline claim
    Statement type
    Metric
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
    Reported by
    Sierra
    Scope
    Pinecone users and sessions in the month preceding the report; calendar month unspecified
    Denominator
    Not reported
    Method
    Not reported
    Observation date
    Not reported
  3. Sandbox
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  4. Harness
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  5. Model
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  6. Interfaces
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  7. Tool access
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  8. Knowledge
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  9. Credentials
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  10. Context management
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  11. MCP Gateway (45 systems)
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  12. Agency sandbox layer
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  13. Intent-based routing
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  14. Start a session from a prompt
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  15. Broker its own pull requests
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  16. Babysit the pull request
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
  17. Key observation

    More than 75,000 sessions created by 600 people in the month preceding the report

    Duplicate representation of Headline claim. Identical statement, figure, period, and scope as the headline; both cite the same passage.

    Statement type
    Metric
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
    Reported by
    Sierra
    Scope
    Pinecone users and sessions in the month preceding the report; calendar month unspecified
    Denominator
    Not reported
    Method
    Not reported
    Observation date
    Not reported
  18. Key observation
    Statement type
    Metric
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Not assessed
    Confidence reason
    No explicit confidence assessment is recorded for this claim.
    Reported by
    Sierra
    Scope
    Company PRs opened through Pinecone in the month preceding the report
    Denominator
    Sierra PRs opened in that month; not merged PRs
    Method
    Not reported
    Observation date
    Not reported
  19. Key observation
    Statement type
    Metric
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    Sierra reported the adoption shares in its engineering blog without a method.
    Reported by
    Sierra
    Scope
    Engineering use of Pinecone and company-wide daily use at report time
    Denominator
    Not reported
    Method
    Not reported
    Observation date
    2026
  20. Key observation
    Statement type
    Metric
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    Sierra reported monthly growth multiples and a cost trend without absolute figures or a method.
    Reported by
    Sierra
    Scope
    Pinecone usage growth since April and reported falling costs; no absolute figures published
    Denominator
    Not reported
    Method
    Not reported
    Observation date
    2026
  21. Lesson
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    The single-agent section describes routing behind the interface, so one employee-facing agent does not imply one model or execution environment.
  22. Lesson
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    The retrospective describes shared adapters and configurable defaults; it supports interchangeable harnesses without claiming every model fits every task.
  23. Lesson
    Statement type
    Fact
    Provenance
    Reported
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    The gateway article describes provenance checks and scoped CLI tokens. These bound particular actions without making every permitted action safe.
  24. Lesson
    Statement type
    Inference
    Provenance
    Catalog judgment
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    The source reports session volume and centralized cost oversight, but provides no method for converting each session into time saved or a quality measure.
  25. Operating model assessment
    Statement type
    Inference
    Provenance
    Catalog judgment
    Confidence
    Medium
    Confidence reason
    The source documents delegated work through a company-wide agent without establishing outcome-only supervision.
    Observation date
    2026